The proposed expansion of the Super League to 14 teams is facing a formidable challenge from within its own ranks, as a growing number of clubs raise the alarm over the potential for financial ruin. Citing a lack of a concrete business plan from the Rugby Football League (RFL), these clubs are now lobbying to halt the process, fearing it could jeopardise the very existence of professional rugby league.
At the heart of the controversy is the financial sustainability of a larger competition. Clubs are questioning the wisdom of adding more teams when the league’s main broadcaster, Sky Sports, has clearly indicated it will not increase its funding. In fact, with the current TV rights deal already slashed from £40m to £21.5m annually since 2021, many fear the next deal could be even smaller, especially if the league proceeds against the broadcaster’s wishes.
The concern is that diluting the central funding pool among more clubs without a corresponding increase in revenue will weaken everyone. One source grimly warned that if the broadcast money diminishes further, some clubs might be forced to abandon their full-time professional status. This fear is compounded by the existing financial fragility within the league, exemplified by the troubles facing Salford Red Devils.
Critics are also pointing to the dangerously accelerated timeline. The decision to expand was voted on in July, the application process for new teams closed just last week, and the new members are set to be announced on October 16th. This rapid-fire approach stands in stark contrast to more established competitions like the NRL, where expansion is a multi-year strategic undertaking. The lack of detailed financial documents or even minutes from the key meeting has only intensified the belief that the process has not been rigorous enough.
While the RFL maintains that clubs voted overwhelmingly for the plan based on the rationale provided, the ground has clearly shifted. The dissenting clubs are not necessarily against expansion in principle but are demanding a more cautious and transparent approach. They are calling for a pause until at least 2027 to ensure the long-term health of the sport is not sacrificed for short-term ambition.